Committee Menu XX Academic Honesty Board MembershipSenate Home 

Committee Type:ACC Standing (Annual Reprt to ACC)
Admin:Catherine Riordan, x3547

Members
Click a name for more information.
NameCte Position TypeVacancy
Reqrmnt		Cte Voting StatusPhoneMSOfficeDeptTerm StartsTerm EndsArea
Riordan, Catherine
Not a member of the panel
 Ex Officio   Other  x3547  9033  OM460  Provost  2009    
Yunker-Acting Registrar, Susanna
Not a member of the panel
 Other Registrar  Non-Voting  x3839  9001  OM 110, OM230  Stud Aff  2008    VP
Perry, Tara
 Faculty   Voting    9162    Comm  2007  2010  C
Denham, Kristin E
 Faculty   Voting  x3217  9055  HU341  English  2007  2010  C
Miran, Jonathan
 Faculty   Voting  360-350-4867  9084  BH 166  LibStd  2009  2010  C
Lobeck, Anne C.
 Faculty   Voting  x3249  9055  HU359  English  2007  2011  C
Devenport, Jennifer
 Faculty   Voting    9172    Psychology  2009  2011  B
Goodvin, Rebecca
 Faculty   Voting    9172    Psychology  2009  2011  B

Membership Summary:
Pool of about six faculty, with two or more appointed each year for a 2-year term in order to create a staggered membership, along with a larger number of graduate and undergraduate students. Faculty members are nominated by the Senate Executive council and appointed by the Vice President for Academic Affairs (the Provost )
For each individual case, the panel chosen will consist of 1 faculty and 2 students


Charge:

MOTION FROM THE ACADEMIC COORDINATING COMMISSION Amended and approved by the Faculty Senate 1-28-08

Academic Honesty Policy and Procedure Appendix D to the Catalog
(b) Appeal: A student who receives a zero on an assignment or an F in a course due to a charge of academic dishonesty and who feels wrongly accused by an instructor has recourse to an appeals process. Within five (5) working days of the finding of academic dishonesty the student may appeal to the unit head.

The unit head shall make a ruling on the case as to whether 1) the student in question committed an act of academic dishonesty; and, if so, 2) whether the violation was a major or minor one, within ten (10) working days of the appeal.

Either the student accused or the faculty member who initiated the charge may within five (5) working days appeal to the Dean, who shall make a ruling on the case as to whether 1) the student in question committed an act of academic dishonesty; and, if so, 2) whether the sanction was appropriate, within ten (10) working days of the appeal.

Either the student accused or the faculty member who initiated the charge may appeal the findings of the Dean to the Academic Honesty Board within five (5) working days.

The Academic Honesty Board shall consist of one faculty member and two students to be selected from a pool of students and faculty appointed by the Vice President for Academic Affairs. (remainder unchanged)



v1.01
Committee Menu Questions/Comments/Help: Faculty Senate x6808Senate Home