BACK

 

FACULTY HANDBOOK:  2005-2007  Edition, Section I

(Note:  Format may be slightly different than printed handbook due to migration through browsers)

 

Section I:  WESTERN WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY

 

I.    Introduction

 

       A.    Purpose of this Handbook

 

             This Faculty Handbook contains statements of institutional policy and procedure duly established by the Board of Trustees and in effect at the time of its adoption.  This Handbook provides a guide by which the Board of Trustees, Faculty, and Administration conduct their relations with each other in matters of faculty employment, welfare, rights, and responsibilities.

 

         B.   Organization of this Handbook

 

             The Faculty Handbook contains eight sections.  The first section applies to all faculty of the University; the others apply, respectively, to the faculties of the several colleges and the University libraries.

 

         C.   Handbook Amendment Procedure

 

                1.    The need to review the Handbook will be considered by the Board of Trustees annually at the February meeting.  It may, however, be reviewed and amended by the Board by motion at its discretion whenever necessary, providing that due notice shall be given of such intention.  When not bound by superior authority, the Board shall hear and consider recommendations from affected faculty before taking final action.

 

                2.    Proposals for amendment of Section I of this handbook may be initiated and presented to the Board(1) by the President who shall, if not sustained by a majority of the affected faculty, at the same time present the faculty recommendations to the Board; (2) by the Faculty Senate; or (3) by the affected faculty through signed petition of 25 faculty members.  Proposals for amendment of sections relating to a single college, school, or the University Libraries may be initiated and presented to the Board (1) by the President, who shall, if not sustained by a majority of the faculty of that college, school, or the University Libraries, at the same time present the faculty recommendations to the Board; (2) by the Faculty governing body of that college, school, or University Libraries; or (3) by the affected faculty through signed petition of 25 faculty members or 20 percent of the affected faculty, whichever is less.

 

                3.    No proposal for amendment shall be acted upon finally and established as policy by the Trustees without due notice to the affected faculty and without hearing and considering their recommendation.  Neither shall any proposal for amendment be acted upon and established as policy by the Trustees without due notice to the President and without hearing and considering the President's recommendation.

 

                4.    Amendments to the Handbook become effective upon approval by the Board of Trustees or a date set by the Board of Trustees.

 

II.   Western Washington University

 

         A.    Organization

 

1.      Western Washington University consists of seven colleges, the Graduate School, and the University Libraries, each with a dean or University Librarian as chief administrative officer. The colleges are the College of Business and Economics, the College of Fine and Performing Arts, the College of Humanities and Social Sciences, the College of Sciences and Technology, Fairhaven College, Huxley College of the Environment, and the Woodring College of Education. In the remainder of this Handbook, the term "colleges" encompasses the units listed above, including the Graduate School and the University Libraries.


 

2.      The President is the chief administrative officer of the University.  Four vice presidents have responsibilities as are indicated by their titles:  Provost/Vice President for Academic Affairs, Vice President for Business and Financial Affairs, Vice President for Student Affairs, and Vice President for External Affairs.

 

                3.    Appendix A gives a detailed organization chart.

 

         B.   Governance

 

                1.    The governing body of the University is the Board of Trustees, which consists of eight members appointed by the governor and confirmed by the State Senate and includes a student appointee.  This body establishes policy for the University; approves appointments; executes contracts on recommendation of the President and in consultation with the faculty, the staff, and the students; and performs other duties prescribed by law. The President of the University is the representative and spokesperson for the Board of Trustees.  The faculty, through the Faculty Senate, works  closely with the President and Provost/Vice President for Academic Affairs in formulating, implementing, and evaluating university policies.  It is the policy of Western Washington University that there shall be meaningful participation by the faculty, through the Faculty Senate or other recognized faculty bodies, in matters relating to academic planning and budgeting and to other matters at all levels of internal university governance.  This is consistent with the University's policy of open participation in governance.

 

                2.    The Faculty Senate represents the faculty in matters concerning faculty welfare, such as salary, insurance and benefits, retirement, and items of university policy. The Executive Council of the Senate prepares the agenda for Senate meetings, considers matters of grievance or delicacy with respect to individual faculty members, meets on a scheduled basis with the President and/or Provost/Vice President for Academic Affairs, and performs such other duties as may be delegated to it by the Faculty Senate.

 

                3.    The Faculty Senate consists of 30 voting Senators, and the President and Provost/Vice President for Academic Affairs as ex officio, non-voting members.  The powers of the Senate, including those of its Executive Council and other councils, are those defined in the Constitution of the Faculty, which appears as Appendix B of this handbook.

 

                4.    When a matter of special importance to the faculty is to be decided, the Faculty Senate may call for a General Faculty Assembly for purposes of discussion and recommendation.

 

         C.   Relationship Among the Colleges of Western Washington University

        

                The faculty of Western Washington University share university facilities, benefits and, retirement provisions, except for the stated limitation pertaining to part-time, limited-term faculty described in Section IV.C.2.c, and are subject to the provisions of Section I of the Faculty Handbook.  Certain procedures, regulations, and requirements regarding such matters as hiring, tenure, promotion, and internal governance may differ from college to college, as indicated in later sections of this handbook, but may not conflict with the policies and procedures of Section I unless the proposed differences in procedures, regulations, and requirements have been reviewed by the Faculty Senate and approved by the Board of Trustees.

 

III.   The Faculty  [updated 12/2004]

 

         A.    Introduction

 

                1.    A faculty member is a person who holds a faculty position as described below in Paragraph III. E. or Paragraph III.F. Each faculty member is assigned to an academic unit.  An academic unit is a college with one or no departments, or an academic department that is the primary area of academic appointments.

 

                2.    The University accomplishes its objectives, as set forth in the general catalog, WWU University Bulletin, primarily with the Academic Coordinating Commission and the Graduate Council.  Department and college faculties are responsible for developing programs and courses that meet University standards and relate to University objectives.  The Faculty Senate has responsibility for matters of faculty welfare.

 

         B.   Academic Freedom

 

         All the ranked and unranked members of the faculty are guaranteed academic freedom as set forth in the 1940 Statement of Principles of Academic Freedom and Tenure, formulated by the Association of American Colleges and the American Association of University Professors.

 

         C.   Faculty Duties

 

         The duties of probationary and tenured faculty include such activities as classroom and laboratory instruction; preparation for teaching, research, scholarly and creative activities; scheduled office hours; student advisement; committee responsibilities; public service that uses faculty's professional expertise; and occasional special assignments.  The duties of full-time, limited-term and part-time, limited-term faculty are fully defined in the letter of offer.

 

         D.   Scholarly and Professional Qualifications of Faculty Members

      

1.   It is the policy of Western Washington University to appoint faculty members who provide evidence of achievement (or the promise of achievement) in teaching, in scholarly or creative endeavors, and in service to the University and community.  Unless otherwise specified in the letter of appointment, retention shall be on the basis of continuing effectiveness in these areas.  Assessment at all levels is to be carried out in accord with the unit evaluation plan.

2.   Faculty members have an obligation to adhere to and behave in keeping with the principles of faculty conduct contained in the Code of Faculty Ethics (found in Appendix F of the Handbook).

3.   Faculty have an obligation to pursue excellence in teaching.

4.   Faculty have an obligation to engage in scholarly and/or creative activity of recognized quality.

5.   Faculty have an obligation to serve their departments, colleges, University, and profession.  In addition, the University values contributions to the wider scholarly and civic communities.

 

         E.     Qualifications and Characteristics of Faculty Ranks

 

                1.    Instructor

 

                 An applicant may be appointed to the rank of instructor if the person shows promise of becoming an effective teacher and scholar.  The applicant should have completed, or nearly completed, formal professional training, which in most cases will be evidenced by completion of the doctoral degree or the accepted terminal degree for the discipline.  An instructor not promoted to assistant professor by the end of the fourth year of service at WWU will not be reappointed.  Tenure is not granted to instructors.

 

                2.    Assistant Professor

 

                 To be appointed or promoted to the rank of assistant professor, a person shall normally possess the doctorate or the accepted terminal degree for the discipline.  An assistant professor should also be able to show evidence of effective teaching and scholarly activity.  In exceptional cases the establishment of a superior record in one of these areas may be sufficient.

 

                3.    Associate Professor

        

                 For appointment or promotion to this rank, a person shall normally possess the doctorate or accepted terminal degree for the discipline.  This rank requires a record of substantial achievement in both teaching and scholarship.  In exceptional cases an outstanding record of achievement in one of these areas may be sufficient.  Candidates for promotion to this rank are also expected to present evidence of contributions to academic policy and program.

 

                4.    Professor

 

                 For appointment or promotion to this rank, a person shall normally possess the doctorate or the  accepted terminal degree for the discipline.  To attain the rank of professor, a faculty member must show evidence of excellent teaching and sustained scholarship. Significant contributions to academic policy and program are also expected.

 

                 Eventual promotion to the rank of Professor is not earned by long service alone, and it is not expected that all faculty members will attain this rank.

 

                5.    Professor Emeritus

 

                The title of emeritus may be conferred by the President of Western Washington University upon retiring faculty members whose contributions have been deemed outstanding by their peers.  Recommendation for the title may be initiated by the faculty member's department, by the appropriate Dean, or by the University Librarian; it requires the support of the Dean of the college and must be approved by the Provost/Vice President of Academic Affairs.  The usual minimum service to Western Washington University is ten years.  On occasion it may be appropriate to honor a retiring associate professor by conferring the title of Associate Professor Emeritus.

 

                In addition to those privileges accorded all retirees, emeritus faculty of Western Washington University are eligible to sit on master's degree candidates' supervisory committees; are listed in the Faculty/Staff Directory and may receive a copy of the directory on written request; are listed in the Western Washington University Bulletin; are eligible to march in graduation and other formal ceremonies of the University; may be appointed members of Faculty Senate committees; may receive a subscription to FAST upon written request; and may use departmental office space and computer facilities on a space-available basis, as determined by the appropriate department.  Emeritus faculty do not vote on matters relating to faculty.

 

         F.    Qualifications and Characteristics of Faculty Without Rank

 

               Expectations for faculty without rank are fully determined by the terms defined in the letter of offer.  Any changes to the expectations shall be agreed to in writing by the faculty member and the Department Chair.

 

                1.    Lecturer

 

                Full or part-time teaching faculty employed on a temporary basis or outside the usual structure of rank and tenure are designated Lecturers.  Initial appointments to the post of Lecturer may be made for a stated period of three years or less.  The appointment expires at the end of the contract period.  In no case shall a person hold a position as full-time Lecturer longer than six years.  Part-time, limited-term employment does not count as probationary service for tenure purposes and is not subject to the limit of six years of service that applies to probationary and full-time, limited-term faculty.  Lecturers may participate in department affairs.  Departmental voting privileges are at the discretion of the department, but may not extend to issues of appointment, tenure, promotion, or other personnel matters.

 

                2.    Special Appointment

 

                A scholar or artist of recognized outstanding attainment may be appointed to any academic rank regardless of the academic degree held.  Faculty hired by special appointment are not granted voting privileges.

 

                3.    Affiliated Teaching Faculty

 

                People may be appointed to perform specialized teaching duties in positions that do not carry tenure, rank, promotion, or faculty voting privileges.  Examples of such positions are affiliated teachers of music and joint appointment of public school teachers for student teaching supervision.  Affiliated Teaching Faculty are not granted voting privileges.

 

                4.    Research Associate

 

                A scholar of recognized attainment may be appointed as a research associate to conduct or direct research.  Research associates are not granted tenure, promotion, or faculty voting privileges and are not salaried by the University.

 

                5.    Visiting Faculty

 

                An individual may be appointed as visiting instructor, visiting assistant professor, visiting associate professor, or visiting professor, provided the individual qualifies for the rank and the appointment is clearly temporary.  Visiting faculty are not granted voting privileges.

 

                6.    Adjunct Professor

 

                A scholar of noteworthy attainment may be appointed as an adjunct professor in order to recognize a collegial affiliation with a University department and its faculty.  The title is an honorary form of association and neither establishes nor recognizes an employee-employer relationship.  Adjunct professors are not granted tenure, promotion, or faculty voting privileges.

 

IV.   Appointments

 

         A.    General Provisions

 

                1.    The appointment of any faculty member shall be on the basis of the requirements of the position and the qualifications of the individual applicant for the position, these Handbook requirements, and qualifications to be judged by the faculty of the unit and approved by the appropriate Dean or University Librarian, the Provost/Vice President for Academic Affairs, and the President, who has appointing authority.

 

                2.    Appointments to faculty positions at the University are of three kinds:

                        a.         probationary appointments (tenure-track)

                        b.         permanent appointments (tenured)

                        c.         limited-term appointments (non-tenure-track)

 

                3.    Appointments for less than full time:

 

                       a.     Fractional appointments are those probationary or permanent appointments carrying less than a Full Time Equivalent Faculty (1.0 FTEF) appointment.  Only in special circumstances will fractional appointments be made.

                       b.     Part-time appointments are limited-term appointments for less than 1.0 FTEF during the academic year.

 

4.      Non-tenured faculty are those faculty on probationary or limited-term appointments.

 

         B.   Initial Appointments and Orientation

 

                1.    The terms and conditions of employment of a faculty member, which shall have the approval of the Department Chair and Dean or University Librarian, are contained in the letter of offer from the Provost/Vice President for Academic Affairs to the faculty member. .  This letter and the provisions of this handbook will be the sole basis for determining the contract.  The items to be defined in the letter of offer shall be the position to be filled, academic rank, salary, specification of appointment (permanent, probationary, or limited-term), expectations with respect to the completion of advanced degrees in relation to rank and tenure, and any other special or limiting provisions.  The President, as appointing authority, must approve all conditions of initial employment and all renewal agreements until tenure is granted.

 

                2.    The faculty member will be advised by the Department Chair or appropriate Dean or University Librarian or director at the time of initial appointment of the substantive standards and procedures generally employed in decisions affecting renewal and tenure as well as any special standards adopted by the faculty member's department or college.  The faculty member will be advised of the time when decisions affecting renewal or tenure are ordinarily made, and will be given the opportunity to submit material which may be helpful to an adequate consideration of his/her renewal or tenure.

 

                3.    Lecturers, probationary faculty, and tenured faculty shall receive a copy of the Faculty Handbook, be issued a WWU I.D. card; receive complete information on insurance and other benefits available; be eligible to serve as appointed members of Faculty Senate committees; become a voting member of the faculty at .5 FTEF or more for University-wide elections; be notified by the Chair or unit head of department meetings; and be informed about any limit on department voting privileges; and shall be provided with a mailbox, office space containing a telephone and a computer, instructional support, and access to departmental office staff.

 

                4.    All other faculty without rank and emeritus faculty shall receive a copy of the Faculty Handbook; be issued a WWU I.D. card; receive complete information on insurance and other benefits for which they are eligible; and shall be provided with the support appropriate to the performance of their duties.

 

         C.   Appointment Categories

 

                1.    Probationary and Tenured

 

                       a.    Permanent Appointments (tenured)         

                    The President or his/her designee, normally by July 1, sends a letter to faculty members on permanent appointment giving notice of continued appointment.  This letter sets forth the salary step and associated salary which the faculty member will receive the forthcoming academic year.  Conditions of this continuing appointment are stated in the letter.

 

                       b.    Probationary Appointments (non-tenured)

                     Probationary appointments may be for one year or for other stated periods.  Probationary appointments may be fractional appointments that involve at least .5 FTEF.  For conditions of probationary service, see section on tenure.

 

                2.    Limited-Term Appointments

 

                     a.    Full-time, limited-term appointments are typically used for replacement of faculty on leave or for staffing experimental programs and should be used only when departments expect in good faith to have only a short-term need.  Part-time, limited-term appointments should be used either to meet temporary personnel needs or to staff part-time positions well below the 1.0 FTEF level.  Limited term appointments expire at the end of the contract period unless extended and do not normally lead to a change in appointment to a tenure-track position.  Departmental voting privileges are described in Section III.F. but may not extend to issues of tenure, promotion, or other personnel matters.

 

                     b.    Departments will make every effort to anticipate the need for limited-term faculty during the regular planning cycle.  Normally, departments will identify existing funds or obtain provisional funding in a timely manner, such that the same timetable will be used to notify tenure-track and limited-term faculty members about their appointment status and job responsibilities for the forthcoming academic year.  Departments will pursue the goal of accurately listing every faculty member and his/her teaching assignments in the class schedule bulletin.  Last minute assignments and changes in responsibility will occur, but should be limited to situations that cannot be reasonably foreseen.  Limited-term faculty members will be appointed for the longest period of time that the need for their services can be anticipated, not to exceed three years per contract.  Specifically, quarter-to-quarter appointments will be avoided whenever a single appointment for the entire academic year is possible.

 

                      c.    Limited-term faculty are eligible for full faculty insurance and retirement benefits once they meet established criteria.  The benefits and criteria governing institutionally supported retirement plans are described in Section XIV of the Faculty Handbook.  The University also offers a variety of insurance coverages, including health, life, and long-term disability insurance.  These insurance plans are provided for and administered by the Washington State Health Care Authority.  Information pertaining to state-paid and optional self-paid coverage, as well as requirements for self-pay continuation of benefits following termination of employment (COBRA), may be obtained from Western's Human Resources Department (Benefits).  The University will make every effort to maximize the possibility that a limited-term faculty member will meet the eligibility criteria.  Specifically, contracts will not be formulated so as to deprive faculty members of eligibility for benefits

 

         D.   Changes in Appointment for Tenure Track or Tenured Faculty

 

1.    Faculty members may negotiate changes in the terms and conditions of their appointments as described in the original letter of offer.  Changes, such as reduced or increased appointment or change in responsibilities, shall be agreed to in writing by the faculty member, the Department Chair, the Dean, or University Librarian, and the Provost/Vice President for Academic Affairs.  Changes may be permanent or of specified duration.  In the case of permanent changes, the faculty member relinquishes the right to return to the original contract without the agreement of the Department Chair, Dean or University Librarian, and Provost/Vice President for Academic Affairs.  Changes of specified duration may be for a period of up to six years and may be renewed by agreement of all parties.  All such changes are subject to approval by the President, as appointing authority.

 

2.   The University may require a faculty member to accept a change in appointment only as a result of the termination of a program or department of instruction.  Such changes in appointment, including possible termination, shall be carried out in a manner consistent with Section E through P of the Reduction-In-Force Policy ("RIF") (Appendix I of this handbook) and Section XV. D. of this handbook.

 

3.   The University does not have an obligation to agree to a change, increase, or reduction in appointment for any faculty member, but must give serious consideration to such requests.

 

4.   Faculty members will receive a copy of the "Payroll Appointment or Change Form" that implements any change in appointment.

 

V.    Evaluation of Faculty

 

         A.    Student Evaluation of Faculty

 

1.   All faculty should have most of their courses evaluated.  The Testing Center is responsible for tabulating standard course evaluations.  Administration of the evaluation is the responsibility of the professor, who should arrange for someone other than him/herself to administer the evaluation.

 

2.   The assessment of teaching, as it contributes to tenure/promotion merit review, shall include both peer review and student evaluations.

 

         B.   Evaluation of Limited Term Faculty  (updated Summer 2004)

 

1.   All limited term faculty shall be evaluated annually by their unit in a manner established by the unit and the appropriate Dean, or University Librarian, on the basis of the expectations and duties defined in the letter of offer.  Other contributions may be included if agreed to in writing by both the faculty member and the Department Chair.  The result of the evaluation is to be summarized in an annual letter from the Department Chair to the Dean or University Librarian, with a copy to the faculty member and the Provost/Vice President for Academic Affairs.  Under no circumstances shall an evaluation of a limited term faculty member be undertaken without the faculty member’s knowledge. 

 

         C.      Evaluation of Probationary Faculty

 

1 .  All probationary faculty shall be evaluated annually by the tenured faculty of their unit, the Department Chair, and the appropriate Dean or University Librarian (according to unit evaluation plans) until the University President grants tenure or does not reappoint. In the case of first year appointments only, a department or college may adopt a procedure that does not require the participation of all tenured faculty. Alternative procedures for first year faculty must be approved by the appropriate Dean or University Librarian, must be the same for all first year faculty in the unit, and must involve the creation of a written report on the faculty member's performance. A written report of this review will constitute the annual evaluation. The annual evaluation shall be completed by March 15 of each year, and shall contain a statement regarding the faculty member’s progress towards tenure.  Under no circumstances shall such an evaluation of a non-tenured faculty member be undertaken without the faculty member’s knowledge. 

 

2.   If a college is organized into departments, formal evaluation is to be summarized in an annual letter from the Department Chairperson to the Dean or University Librarian with a copy to the non-tenured faculty member and the Provost/Vice President for Academic Affairs.  This letter is to contain the Department Chairperson's report and a synthesis of comments from the evaluating body of the department.  Tenured members have the right and responsibility of participating in the evaluation.  Evaluations should be invited from all probationary members of the department, but should not be required.  All faculty evaluations that are appropriate shall be used in the evaluation.

 

3.   If a college is not organized into departments, the annual letter of evaluation is prepared by the Dean and sent to the Provost/Vice President for Academic Affairs with a copy to the faculty member.  Members of the respective college faculty participate in the process in the same manner as department faculty in the colleges with departments.

 

4.   Each faculty member shall prepare and submit to his/her Department Chair or Dean an annual activity report listing courses taught, publications, and other scholarly accomplishments, and service to the University and community.  Annual activity reports shall be prepared in a format developed by each college to suit its unique needs.

 

         D.    Evaluation of Tenured Faculty Members

 

1.   Tenured faculty are entitled to and may request a regular review concerning general professional goals and standards, or in relation to any personnel actions (promotion, general merit, special merit) for which they may wish to be considered.  This review shall take the form of a conference with the Department Chair according to established departmental procedures or, if desired, the Dean.

 

2.   Formal evaluation of tenured faculty is undertaken to review and assess professional growth and development.  Such evaluation is undertaken whenever a favorable personnel action is under consideration and at such other times as departmental or collegiate policy may dictate.  For purposes of establishing continuing adequacy of performance and satisfactory professional development and growth, tenured faculty must regularly be evaluated by a Professional Performance / Development Review. The Professional Performance / Development Review includes review by department peers.  This review will normally occur every five years after the faculty member receives tenure.  Under no circumstances will such an evaluation of a tenured faculty member be undertaken without the faculty member's knowledge.  If a faculty member fails to provide current materials for the review period or otherwise does not adequately participate in the review s/he will be considered to have failed the review.  Policies and procedures for evaluation of tenured faculty are those appropriate to the personnel action being considered and are developed by the faculty of each academic unit in accordance with unit evaluation plan guidelines.

 

3.   Formal evaluation of tenured faculty also may be undertaken where there is substantial evidence that the faculty member has not performed his/her duties adequately.  In the case of the alleged inadequate performance, no formal evaluation shall be undertaken until the faculty member has been notified of the allegations and has had an opportunity to respond to them.  Under no circumstances will such an evaluation of a tenured faculty member be undertaken without the faculty member's knowledge.

 

4.   While it is expected that tenured faculty will receive a Professional Performance / Development (PP/D) Review every five years, the review period will be three years if the shorter period is required for accreditation.  Flexibility in this requirement is permissible.  A shorter review period, for example, may occur if a PP/D review is not successfully passed (in line with V.C.3) or if specified by a unit evaluation plan.  A longer period might occur, for example, if a faculty member eligible for a five-year review is within a year or two of retirement.  Adjustments to lengthen or shorten the review period are also possible to accomplish a department’s administrative aims such as equalizing the percent of faculty reviewed in any one year.  Changes in the length of the review period should be approved by the department’s college.

 

5.   Procedures for Professional Performance / Development Review

 

a.    Faculty undergoing a Professional Performance / Development Review shall provide to the Chair and other colleagues in the department evidence of teaching effectiveness, scholarly/creative/artistic endeavor, and service to the institution and profession.  The materials required for this evidence is specified in the unit evaluation plan.  It is suggested that the materials include a comprehensive vita, the annual reports for the review period, students’ evaluations of the instructional quality of most classes taught, peer evaluations of teaching, syllabi for courses taught, examples of students’ work, distributions of assigned grades, a comprehensive listing of publications or creative/artistic activities during the review period, and examples of the most significant scholarly or creative/artistic accomplishments.  {revised 12/2005}

 

b.    Standards for evaluation in the areas of teaching scholarly/creative/artistic endeavors, and service are determined by the descriptions of various academic ranks as established in the Faculty Handbook, Section I.III.E., "Qualifications and Characteristics of Faculty Ranks."  The faculty member's performance shall be classified as unsatisfactory, satisfactory, or superior for each area.  The review period shall include all evidence accumulated since the last successful review.

 

c.    Departmental summaries and Chair's evaluations are forwarded to a college-wide committee for review, evaluation, and recommendation to the Dean.  Materials accompanying the departmental recommendation, if any,  are specified by the unit evaluation plan. In units without departments (Fairhaven College and the Library), review materials are sent directly to the unit committee for review, evaluation, and recommendation to the Dean or University Librarian.

 

d.    Faculty receiving an unsatisfactory evaluation in teaching shall be given help from the institution to achieve a satisfactory evaluation and shall be evaluated for teaching again the next year.

 

6.    Each faculty member shall prepare and submit to his/her Department Chair or Dean an annual activity report listing courses taught, publications, and other scholarly accomplishments, and service to the University and community.  Annual activity reports shall be prepared in a format developed by each college to suit its unique needs.

 

         E. Unit Evaluation Plans

 

1.    Each college and library shall develop a unit evaluation plan by which its members will be evaluated. It is the responsibility of the Dean or University Librarian to provide every faculty member with a copy of the current Unit Evaluation Plan.  A department may prepare an addendum to the unit evaluation plan which is consistent with the unit evaluation plan but provides more specific criteria for its members. Faculty not clearly identified with one college or library will be evaluated according to specifications outlined in the letter of offer. 

 

2.   The unit evaluation plans specify how evaluation varies according to its purpose, be it reappointment, tenure, promotion, general merit, or special merit.

 

3.   The three domains of faculty activity are teaching, scholarship/creative endeavor, and service.  Unit evaluation plans should address the types of materials faculty members should assemble for evaluation within each domain. The unit evaluation plan should acknowledge that University teaching comprises more than classroom performance, and evidence beyond student evaluations must be brought to bear in assessing teaching. Recommendations as to (1) activities of the faculty which the evaluation process should address, and (2) evidence that might be assembled and examined are itemized in Section V.C.5.a.

 

4.   The unit evaluation plan sets the relative importance of each domain in each type of evaluation, or explains how the relative importance is determined.  (This must comply with III.E. of the Handbook.)

 

5.   The evaluation plan describes the evaluators' responsibilities and how to promote their fulfillment.  The plan identifies those circumstances under which evaluations from outside the unit will be sought, and how such evaluations are to be treated.

 

6.   The evaluation plan, or any revision of an existing plan, requires the approval of the college (or library) faculty policy-making committee, and the Dean (or University University Librarian).  The Provost/Vice President for Academic Affairs will review and approve the evaluation plan for compliance with University standards and procedures.  A departmental addendum requires the same approach.

 

7.    Each Unit Evaluation Plan shall be reviewed and, where appropriate, revised at least every six years.  It is the responsibility of the Dean (or University Librarian) to see that the current version of the plan is being used. However, where a review term straddles one or more changes in the plan, a faculty member may choose which one of the applicable plans under which he or she is assessed.

 

VI.   Tenure Regulations

 

A.       Eligibility for Tenure

 

1.   The President, as appointing authority, after review of recommendations from the faculty and the appropriate Dean (or University Librarian) and the Provost, grants tenure to faculty who have served a period of probationary service and who in the judgment of the faculty, the appropriate Dean, the Provost and the President are capable of making substantial contributions to the University.  The President, as appointing authority, upon recommendation of the faculty, the appropriate Dean and the Provost, may also grant tenure at the time of initial appointment to individuals of outstanding reputation.  Normally, tenure is granted only to those who hold the rank of associate professor or professor.

 

2.   The eligibility of a faculty member for tenure is determined by the conditions of initial appointment contained in the letter of offer.  Faculty members who are eligible for tenure are probationary faculty.  Appointments of less than .5 FTEF are never probationary; they are part-time, limited-term appointments.  Appointments of .5 FTEF or more may be either probationary or limited-term, depending on the conditions specified in the letter of offer.

 

B.      Calculating Fraction of Appointment and Period of Service

 

1.   Only appointments of .5 FTEF or greater are used to determine duration of service for purposes of determining the probationary period.

 

2.   The unit of time for determining fractional service is the academic year.  A faculty member employed full-time for one quarter holds an appointment of .33 FTEF, as does a faculty member on .33 FTEF appointment for all three quarters of an academic year.  Summer session does not count toward period of service for tenure consideration.

 

3.   The period of probationary service at the University is equal to the number of years served on a full or qualifying fractional (.5FTEF or more) appointment.  For example, a faculty member who worked .5 FTEF for three years would have accumulated 3 years of probationary service to the University.

 

C.      Procedures for Granting Tenure   (12/2004)

 

1.   When a candidate applies for tenure and/or promotion, the total professional profile of the individual will be considered.  All candidates must demonstrate a record of accomplishment at Western Washington University.

 

2.   A candidate may not add new material to his or her file, except to update the status of scholarly or creative work in progress, once it has left the candidate’s department.

 

3.   The total period of full-time service at Western Washington University prior to the acquisition of tenure will not exceed seven years of probationary service, subject to qualifications described in provisions below. 

 

                        a.  Scholarly leave of absence of one year or less, except for work on an advanced degree, will count as part of the probationary period, unless the individual and the President or the President’s designee agree in writing to an exception to this provision at the time the leave is granted. 

 

                        b.  The total period of full-time service at Western Washington University prior to the acquisition of tenure will be automatically extended to a maximum of eight years for faculty taking pregnancy leave, with or without pay.  This extension is also available, upon application to the President or the President's designee, to those who would otherwise be eligible but who choose not to take a leave of absence.

 

                        c.  The President or President's designee may grant an extension of one year to the probationary period, on request by the faculty member, as a result of the faculty member's having taken compassionate leave or as a result of significant disruptions in the life of the faculty member where such events can be shown to have affected significantly, or are expected to affect significantly, his/her ability to engage productively in activities normally evaluated in tenure consideration. 

 

                        d.  The faculty member will be evaluated for tenure not later than the sixth year of service (or as amended by extension, under the provisions above).  An unsuccessful application before the sixth year does not change the probationary period.

  

        4.          a.  Recommendation regarding tenure is initiated in the academic unit (which, generally speaking consists of department and Chair), which has primary responsibility for the evaluation of a candidate's file.  The recommendation of the academic unit  is reviewed by the appropriate tenure and promotion committee, if any, and the Dean according to the standards and procedures of the college or library unit evaluation plan. The Dean forwards her/his recommendation and those of the academic unit and tenure and promotion committee to the Provost/Vice President for Academic Affairs.  The Provost reviews the recommendations for compliance with University standards and procedures and in turn makes recommendation to the President.  Candidates will be notified of the President's decision prior to March 15.

 

                        b.  Candidates will receive a copy of the letters of recommendation prepared by the Department Chair, the tenure and promotion committee, the Dean, and the Provost.

 

                         c.   In instances where the Chair, the tenure and promotion committee, the Dean, or the Provost recommends against tenure, the letter from the negative recommender will give the specific reasons for the negative recommendation.  Upon receipt of a negative recommendation at any level, the candidate will have fifteen working days to submit a written response to the negative recommendation, which will accompany the candidate’s file to the next level of the process.  A candidate who has received a negative recommendation at any level may meet with the Dean or the Provost once the file has reached that level. A negative recommendation at any level does not stop the process—at each level the candidate may choose either to proceed forward or withdraw.  A candidate who withdraws from the tenure process in his or her final year of eligibility will be considered to have resigned from the University effective at the end of the next academic year, unless the candidate submits a resignation to take effect earlier than the conclusion of the next academic year, and will not receive notification from the President regarding the tenure application.

 

      d.  If, in the candidate’s last year of eligibility for tenure, the President denies tenure, the candidate may appeal the denial to the Board of Trustees, which may conduct an adjudicative proceeding pursuant to the Administrative Procedures Act, Chapter 34.05.RCW.  If the President fails to grant tenure by the sixth year of service or by the end of an extended probationary period as allowed in Section VI.C.2.c, the contract for the forthcoming year shall be a terminal contract.

 

      e.   For Faculty holding fractional probationary appointments, the granting of tenure conveys rights to only the fractional appointment held at the time tenure is granted.

[material in Sections III. through VI.  revised by the Senate and approved by BOT 12/2004]

 

VII.  Policies on Affirmative Action, Employment, Equal Opportunity, and Discrimination

 

A.     It is the policy of the Board of Trustees of Western Washington University to provide equal employment opportunity for all employees and applicants for employment regardless of race, color, religion, national origin, sex, pregnancy, age, marital status, sexual orientation, Vietnam or disabled veteran status, or, except as provided by law, the presence of any sensory, mental, or physical disability.

 

B.     WWU Affirmative Action, Employment, Equal Opportunity, and Discrimination Guidelines appear in Appendix C of this Handbook.  The details of these policies and their implementation are contained in a publication entitled, “Western Washington University Administrative Policies and Procedures of Affirmative Action, Employment, Equal Opportunity, and Discrimination,”  which is available from the Equal Opportunity Center.

 

VIII. Conflict of Interest Resulting From Family Relationship

 

         It is an objective of Western Washington University to employ and retain the best qualified individuals as members of the faculty, administration, and staff.  The protection of the individual as well as of the University, however, requires certain safeguards from potential conflicts of interest.  Therefore, the following policies regarding employment of members of the same family shall apply to members of the same family, persons in a co-habitation relationship, and any persons engaged in a romantic or sexual relationship.  "Family Members" shall be defined as spouse, sibling, parent, or offspring.

 

         A.    Members of the same family, persons in cohabitation relationships, or persons engaged in romantic or sexual relationships may be employed by Western Washington University on the faculty in the same department or in different departments so long as each person meets the standards of qualification.

 

         B.    No faculty member, department chairperson, academic dean, or other academic administrative officer of Western Washington University shall initiate or in any way participate in any decision which involves the appointment, evaluation, promotion, retention, or dismissal of a family member, a person with whom he/she is in a co-habitation relationship, or a person with whom he/she has a romantic or sexual relationship or which might have a direct effect on the condition of employment with the University of a family member, a person with whom he/she is in a cohabitation relationship, or a person with whom he/she is having a romantic or sexual relationship.  Whenever a department chairperson, academic dean, or other administrative officer would in the normal course of business initiate or participate in a decision prohibited under this sub-section, the Provost/Vice President for Academic Affairs shall delegate the responsibility for such decision to an appropriate person.

 

         C.   No employee shall review, audit, or administer public funds under the control of another family member, a person with whom the employee is in a co-habitation relationship, or a person with whom the employee has a romantic or sexual relationship.

 

         D.   When an employee discovers that his/her duties will lead to making decisions regarding the appointment, evaluation, promotion, retention, or dismissal of a family member, a person with whom he/she is in a cohabitation relationship, or a person with whom he/she has a romantic or sexual relationship, he/she will promptly inform his/her immediate supervisor (chair, director, dean, etc.) and request that those duties be assigned to a different employee.

 

         E.    See Appendix C, Section I for Western Washington University’s policy on nondiscrimination in applying nepotism rules.

 

IX.   Faculty Files

 

         A.    There are three groups of faculty files maintained by the office of the Provost/Vice President for Academic Affairs and the dean of the appropriate college. 

 

1.   Initial employment files.  These files contain material received, including confidential recommendations, prior to initial appointment.  These materials are kept sealed in the office of the Provost/Vice President for Academic Affairs for a period of seven years, at which time they are destroyed.  These files are confidential.

 

2.   Faculty personnel files.  These files contain an updated vita; annual reports as submitted to the dean; copies of all communications with the faculty member regarding appointment and terms of contract; the chairperson's annual letters of evaluation of non-tenured faculty; letters of commendation and/or letters critical of a faculty member.  A copy of any such letter of commendation and/or letter critical of a faculty member shall be sent to the faculty member at the time the letter is placed in his/her file.

 

3.   A faculty member has the right to review his/her personnel file and to place written responses to any material in the file.  No items may be removed from a faculty member's file, except for brief inspection or copying.

 

4.   Faculty files relating to awards including tenure, promotion, general and special merit.  These files contain the materials generated during review, recommendation, and actions.  The material submitted by the candidate in support of the application is returned to the candidate once a final decision is made.

 

         B.    Documents relative to grievances are maintained by the Provost/Vice President for Academic Affairs and the Faculty Senate Office.

 

         C.   The law regarding confidentiality shall be followed.  The Faculty Personnel Files and other files, including those relating to tenure, promotion, general and special merit, grievances, and sexual harassment are not subject to public inspection.

 

           Anyone wishing to inspect University files and other public records regarding individual faculty members must make a request in writing to the Public Records Officer or to the Provost/Vice President for Academic Affairs in accordance with WAC 516-11-080.  When a request is made by anyone not having access in the normal course of university business to the file requested, the Public Records Officer or the Provost/Vice President of Academic Affairs shall make a reasonable effort to notify as promptly as possible the person whose file is being inspected and shall provide that person with a copy of the written request to examine the file.

 

X.    Salary Policy  

 

         A.    Objectives

 

1.   The objective of the salary policy is to formalize the relationship between performance, qualifications and salary or salary change.  All probationary and tenured faculty are covered by this policy.  Limited-term faculty on .5 or more appointment having served six or more quarters are also covered by this policy.  The Faculty Senate, with the advice of the Salary and Welfare Committee, recommends proposed salary changes to the University Administration for review and adoption by the Board of Trustees.

 

2.   It is the objective of the University to recognize faculty achievement in the areas of teaching, scholarship or creative/artistic endeavor, and professional service, as judged by peer and administrative review, with increases in salary.  When the performance of a faculty member is reviewed for purposes of salary increase, such review shall involve the informed judgment of peers as a major part of the review process.

 

3.   It is the objective of the University to hire and retain the most qualified faculty and to compensate faculty without regard to race, gender, or any other factor unrelated to the faculty member's performance of his/her duties or to economic conditions as described in Section D.  A clear and equitable salary policy is a necessary means to that objective.

 

4.   To be fair and equitable, a salary policy must provide an objective and public means for determining the distribution of salary resources, which are necessarily limited.  This salary policy provides for distribution of salary resources to recognize continued professional growth of faculty, faculty achievements of merit, changes in the overall cost of living, and differences in market conditions that affect hiring and retention of faculty.

 

         B.   Salary Calendar

                 

           The contract period for the academic year begins September 16 and ends June 15.  Workshop and Continuing Education classes, externally funded research projects, and the Summer Session, which are not funded from State appropriations, are not considered part of the faculty member's regular assignment.  A faculty member may earn additional compensation for these activities.  In the case of externally funded research projects, the additional compensation shall not exceed the amount specifically approved by the sponsor, and shall be subject to all other limitations imposed by the sponsor.  Additional compensation during the academic year that is paid from Federal funds is subject to the limitations of the Office of Management and Budget Circulars.

 

         C.   Salary Schedule

 

1.    Compensation shall be based upon a continuing salary schedule to be adopted by the Board of Trustees.  Each year the Faculty Senate recommends to the President a specific salary schedule for administrative review and for presentation to the Board of Trustees for adoption.

 

2.   Salary policy requires that the salary schedule show academic year (nine-month) salaries with provision for full-step and half-step increments.  A full-step increment is defined to be a 3 percent increase over the previous step.

 

         D.   Salary Categories and Priorities

 

            This salary policy classifies the division of any legislative appropriation designated for faculty salary increases and monies available from other sources permitted by law into five categories: (1) promotion; (2) general merit: (3) cost of living; (4) special merit; (5) equity, compression, retention; and (6) specifically designated funds. Those salary increases obtained for 1-5 will be disbursed under the provisions described in Section E below.  The priorities for dividing funds among these categories are as follows:

1.   Promotion

Promotions shall be the first priority in the funding of faculty salary increases.  The salary increase for promotions shall be a three-step increase effective at the beginning of the next academic year following promotion.  Promotion steps shall be in addition to any general merit steps to which the individual may be entitled: however, faculty are not eligible for special merit in the year in which they are promoted.  Promotion raises will be financed from funds recaptured within the University through retirements and resignations.  In those years when there is insufficient money to fund all promotions from recapture funds or other existing sources permitted by law, sufficient money from any legislative appropriations for salary increases shall be used to fund them.  Should recapture dollars be insufficient and the Legislature not provide sufficient appropriations for salary increases, those promotions shall be funded the next time money is available from recapture funds or legislative appropriations.

2.   General Merit Step Adjustment

Funding of general merit shall be second only to promotion in funding priority.  Eligibility for a General Merit Step increase depends both on: a) availability of funds allocated by the State Legislature and b) satisfactory performance of professional duties and an indication of professional development and growth as shown by successful passing of the faculty member's last Professional Performance/ Development Review (V.D.2).

3.   Cost of Living

Salary funds shall be allocated for this purpose after the needs of promotion and general merit steps have been satisfied.  Funding shall not exceed the actual percentage change in the Consumer Price Index less 3 percent.  The index used shall be the CPI-U.S. for all Urban Consumers published by the U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics.  The actual CPI increase shall include the time period from the CPI cutoff month of the last legislative increase to the CPI index for the fourth month prior to the month in which the salary increase becomes effective.  All faculty covered by this salary policy shall be given equal percentage increases.  These increases shall be reflected in an upward adjustment in the value of each step and half-step on the salary schedule.

4.   Special Merit

Special Merit shall be funded using 75 percent of any funding remaining after priorities 1-3 of this section have been met.  Merit awards shall be made in half-step increments to eligible faculty.  A faculty member may be awarded more than one half-step increment as part of a special merit award.

5.   Equity, Compression, Retention

Equity, compression, and retention shall be funded using 25 percent of any funding remaining after priorities 1-3 of this section have been met.  Permanent adjustments to faculty salaries shall be made in half-step increments.  A faculty member may be awarded more than one half-step increment as part of an equity, compression, or retention adjustment in salary.

6.   Specially Designated Funds

In the event that the Legislature appropriates funds designated specifically for purposes such as faculty retention and recruitment, the Salary and Welfare committee, after consulting with the University Planning Council, and in consultation with University administration, will propose a process for the allocation of such funds and provide a rationale for the proposed allocation process to the Faculty Senate for approval. To the extent allowed by legislative intent, any proposed allocation process should both balance the various factors that can affect faculty morale, retention and recruitment and also respond to the priorities of the current situation.

 

         E.    Criteria and  Administration of Funds

 

                1.    Criteria for General Merit Step Increase

 

                (a)   Tenured Faculty

                              (1)   Tenured faculty shall be reviewed by their college/library/departmental peers through a formal Professional Performance /Developmental Review process (V.D.2 & 5).

 

                              (2)   A faculty member having been tenured or promoted from assistant to associate or associate to full professor will be deemed as having satisfied the requirements for general merit step increase for increases occurring during the review period subsequent to the promotion.  Review of the faculty member in the final year of the review period will be necessary to qualify for any general merit increase in the subsequent year. {revised 12/2005}

 

                (b)   Probationary Faculty:  Probationary faculty shall be reviewed annually in accordance with Section V.A & C.

                              (1)   Newly Hired Probationary Faculty.  During the initial year of appointment newly hired faculty are not eligible for general merit.  They are, however, eligible for any increases in the base (value of the step).

 

(2)    Continuing Probationary Faculty:  For each year following the year of initial appointment, probationary faculty who have received a positive annual review in the preceding year will be deemed as having positively satisfied the eligibility requirements for general merit in the following academic year.

 

                       (c)   Limited-Term Faculty:  Limited-term faculty are not eligible for general merit during their first six quarters of service.  Limited-term faculty who have served at a .5 FTE appointment or more for six quarters shall be reviewed for eligibility for general merit by their college/departmental peers through a formal process.  Subsequent reviews shall occur after nine additional quarters of service at .5 FTE or more.  All reviews of limited-term faculty shall be conducted as part of the normal college/departmental review process of faculty for general merit eligibility.  Limited-term faculty at a less than .5 FTE appointment are not eligible for general merit.

 

                       (d)   Review Procedures:

 

                              Peer evaluations, departmental summaries, and chair's evaluation, along with the candidate's file, are forwarded to a college-wide committee for review, evaluation, and recommendation to the Dean.  In units without departments (Fairhaven and Huxley College and the Library), peer evaluations and the candidate's file are sent directly to the unit committee for review, evaluation, and recommendation to the Dean or University Librarian.  This process shall evaluate the performance of the faculty member in three areas for the review period:  teaching effectiveness, scholarly/creative/artistic endeavor, and service to the institution and profession.  Standards for evaluation in these areas are determined by the descriptions of various academic ranks as established in the Faculty Handbook, Section I.III.E., "Qualifications and Characteristics of Faculty Ranks."  The faculty member's performance shall be classified as unsatisfactory, satisfactory, or superior for each area.  These review results shall form the basis for receiving salary increases.  A faculty member shall be eligible for a General Merit increase in each year until the next review if that faculty member receives satisfactory evaluations or better in at least two areas, one of which must be at least a satisfactory evaluation in teaching effectiveness.  The review period shall include all evidence accumulated since the last successful review for general merit.  {revised 12/2005}

 

                              Faculty receiving an unsatisfactory evaluation in teaching shall be given help from the institution to achieve a satisfactory evaluation and shall be evaluated for teaching again the next year.  If the evaluation is satisfactory or superior and the faculty member has also received a satisfactory evaluation in one of the two other areas, then the individual shall be eligible for a general merit increase for the next two years providing funds are available.  That individual's normal review will be two years after the follow-up review.

 

                2.    Criteria for Special Merit Increases 

 

                       Faculty members whose performance justifies financial reward beyond the normal professional growth recognized by general merit awards may be granted special merit increases.  The evaluation for special merit shall be based primarily upon peer review and shall include all evidence since the last special merit increase.  Distribution of merit awards among units of the colleges and library and procedures for awarding special merit shall be determined through the governance system of the college or library and in accordance with procedures for evaluation of faculty outlined in Section V of this handbook, subject to the following condition:  merit increases shall be distributed to colleges and the library on a prorated FTE basis of faculty covered under this policy.  Faculty are automatically considered for a special merit increase every fifth year as part of the general review process described in X.E.1.               

 

                       A faculty member may request to be reviewed for consideration for special merit or promotion in the intervening years.  For faculty members who do this and receive at least a satisfactory evaluation in teaching and at least one other area, their next scheduled general review shall be five years after the requested review.  A listing of faculty receiving special merit shall be published in FAST.

 

                3.    Criteria for Equity, Compression, and Retention Fund

 

                       Forty percent of the monies available in this category shall be administered by the Provost in consultation with the Salary and Welfare Committee and with the deans and the University Librarian.  Sixty percent of the funds, to be administered by colleges and libraries, shall be distributed on a prorated FTE basis of faculty covered under this policy.  These funds shall be administered by the deans and the University Librarian in consultation with the faculty committee of their respective unit.  A listing of faculty receiving these adjustments shall be published in FAST.  In any year in which the dollars available for these purposes exceed the need, those dollars not otherwise used shall be placed in the Special Merit Fund for that College or the Libraries.

 

                4.    Written Procedures 

 

                       Each college and the Libraries shall develop and have a set of written procedures for evaluating faculty for General and Special Merit and an appeal procedure for General Merit.

 

                5.    Legislative Action

 

                       If any portion of this salary policy is found to conflict with legislation specifying how salary funds are to be distributed, then such legislation shall take precedence over this policy.

 

                       In any year that the State Legislature's action does not permit implementation of this policy, then the Salary and Welfare Committee, in cooperation with the University Administration, shall develop a recommendation for that year.  The  recommendation shall be approved by the Faculty Senate before implementation. 

 

         F.    Insurance

 

The University offers a variety of insurance coverages, including health, dental, life, and long-term disability insurances.  Details of these plans are sent to eligible* faculty when hired.  All faculty are notified of any changes mandated by the State Employees Insurance Board (SEIB).  Details of the various plans are available from the Faculty/Staff Benefits Office.

 

 *Faculty who teach one-half time or more for two or more quarters are eligible for SEIB-paid coverages and optional coverage.

 

XI.   Summer Session Appointments

 

         In planning for the summer session, first consideration is given to the curricular offerings of the program. The summer session faculty is selected to staff that program.  The University does not have the obligation to provide a summer teaching assignment for any faculty member, nor does the University have the right to demand the services of any faculty member for the summer session, except in the case of those department chairpersons whose appointments are for 11 months.  When a department has more qualified faculty desiring summer employment than are needed for its program, the department shall propose a rotation plan subject to administrative approval.

 

         The full-time salary for the nine-week session of summer quarter is equal to .25 of the individual's academic year salary.

 

XII.          Reimbursements, Retainers, Honoraria;  Policy on Consulting, etc.

 

         A.    Reimbursement of Expenses

 

           The University finances, partially or entirely, official attendance at professional meetings of faculty members who represent the institution and who participate in the programs presented at such meetings.  Financial arrangements covering travel and expenses must be made in advance with the department chairperson or the dean, as the case may be.  University travel regulations may be obtained from the department chairperson or appropriate dean or the Division of Purchasing.  The Division of Purchasing administers these regulations.

 

                Funds for out-of-state travel are available on a priority basis as follows:

 

                1.    To faculty presenting papers at meetings of learned societies, public performances, or exhibits, with preferences given to those presentations which are to be published or otherwise recorded and for which other funds are not available.

 

                2.    To officers of organizations or learned societies and those participating in programs of meetings.

 

                3.    To department chairpersons on official business, including interviewing prospective faculty.

 

                4.    To faculty members attending meetings of organizations of learned societies.  A faculty member seeking travel support should apply to the chairperson and/or dean.  Funds for international travel for the presentation of invited papers may be available, upon application, from the Bureau for Faculty Research.  The University will reimburse faculty members for travel required by the University.

 

B.     Policy on Consulting and Other Compensated Professional Activities (updated 6/2004)

          

 Introduction

        The first obligation of members of the faculty and staff is the preparation for and carrying out of official University duties. Faculty and staff who are full-time are expected to devote full-time effort to their institutional responsibilities. At the same time, the university recognizes that individuals, the University, and the state benefit from faculty and staff involvement in and support of outside organizations and industry. Such involvement provides individuals opportunities to create and disseminate expert information outside of the traditional university employment structure while simultaneously providing individuals additional experiences, augmenting their ability to carry out their University responsibilities. The University benefits in its ongoing relationships with the local, regional, national, and international communities it seeks to serve.

 

        University faculty members serving as consultants or engaging in outside compensated professional activities, can be valuable resources to government, industry, public and private organizations. The University encourages faculty members to engage in such activities provided that they do not interfere with the performance of University duties and that no conflict of interest exists.

 

        Full-time faculty members are compensated for full-time service to the University in instruction, research, and public service responsibilities. The University expects that each full-time faculty member will assume a proper share of the functions and responsibilities of the department, college, and the University. A faculty member may engage in other professional activities beyond the scope of duties as a faculty member within the following guidelines.

 

Guidelines

 

These guidelines are designed to protect the integrity of the faculty member-University work relationship.

 

1.      Professional Activities Commensurate with the University’s Mission. Outside work must be consistent with the University’s mission and must enhance the faculty member’s professional development. Outside work includes consulting, advising, research, demonstrating, or teaching for other organizations in the areas of professional competence for which the faculty member is employed by Western Washington University. Outside profit-making business activities engaged in for personal monetary gain and which are not related to the area of professional competence for which the faculty member is employed by the University are covered under the state ethics laws. Outside work must be conducted in compliance with the university’s policy on Using University Resources.

 

2.      Non-Interference with Professional Duties.   Outside work must not interfere with a faculty member’s normal official University duties, including those non-classroom responsibilities expected of all faculty members, as defined by each college.

 

3.      Compensation.  Compensation for outside work includes salaries, fees, or gifts. No additional compensation may be accepted by faculty members for tutoring students in courses they teach, or for performing their official duties. Faculty members may accept compensation for outside work only if all of the following conditions are satisfied:

     a. The agreement to do the work is bona fide and the work is actually performed.

    b. The performance of the work is not within the faculty member’s official duties, nor under the faculty member’s official supervision.

     c. The work does not involve assisting others in transactions with state agencies as prohibited by law.

    d. The work is not performed for, nor the compensation received from a person from whom the faculty member is prohibited by law from receiving a gift.

     e. The agreement for the outside work is not expressly created or authorized by the faculty member in his or her official capacity or by the University.  The university recognizes and fully respects the principle of individual ownership of intellectual property.  Research and publication are a central part of a faculty member’s responsibility.  This research is often deemed valuable by a variety of communities beyond the university, and the university recognizes the right and responsibility of a faculty member to share his or her research as widely as possible.  If a faculty member is compensated by anyone beyond the university for research or publication performed as part of the faculty member’s duties as a faculty member, the university will not consider that a violation of this policy.

     f. The work does not require unauthorized disclosure of University confidential information.

 

4. Solicitation.  Arranging for outside work must be consistent with the state’s Ethics in Public Service Law. If the outside work is for another state agency, the award must satisfy the following additional conditions.

        a. The award was a result of open and competitive bidding or selection process and more than one bid was received.

        b. The award was a result of open and competitive bidding or selection process but only one bid was received. In this case the state agency making the award must, prior to the execution of the award, request that the Ethics Board review the award process and advise the faculty member that the award would not conflict with the discharge of the faculty member’s official duties.

        c. The award was not a result of open and competitive bidding or selection process. In this case the state agency making the award must, prior to the execution of the award, request that the Ethics Board review the award process and advise the faculty member that the award would not conflict with the discharge of the faculty member’s official duties.

 

5. Limits and Approvals. The University values faculty-student exchanges and expects a high quality performance of teaching, research and service duties. Therefore, full-time faculty must not spend more than the equivalent of one day per week during the academic year in outside compensated professional activities. Exceptions to this limit may be made on the recommendation of the Department Chair, with the approval of the Dean (or other comparable unit administrator), and of the Provost.

 

        All outside work must be disclosed prior to accepting the work, and reported annually by the faculty member to the Department Chair (or comparable unit administrator) who will maintain the reports on file and prepare a report to the Dean. Outside work by a Department Chair or a Dean must be reported to the Provost. Each Dean will submit to the Provost an annual report on outside work by faculty members in the college.

 

        These limits and approvals do not apply to work by full-time faculty on nine-month appointments outside periods of obligated service.

 

        Faculty members who hold part-time appointments (.50 FTE or more) with the University may be self-employed or may accept additional employment outside the University up to a level corresponding to a full-time position without approvals.

 

        The Department Chair (or other comparable unit administrator) must determine whether the outside compensated professional activity by the faculty member will interfere with the performance of official University duties in each specific case. If such work does, in the judgment of the Department Chair (or comparable unit administrator), interfere with the faculty member’s performance of University duties or with meeting the faculty member’s obligations to the students and the University, the faculty member must either make an acceptable revision of the extent of the proposed activities, or apply for a partial or full leave of absence. If the faculty member does not agree with the judgment of the Department Chair, he/she may appeal to the Dean (or comparable unit administrator), whose decision shall be final.

 

6. Use of Facilities. University facilities (equipment, space, or computers) may not be used for compensated outside work with the exception of compensated professional activities allowed under the above provisions. In all other cases, if the equipment or facilities are unique and are unavailable in the private sector, the faculty member may request approval for use, which must be for a specific project and of a limited duration. Such use must not conflict with the instructional or research activities of the University. Fees for such use shall be determined by the Department Chair or Dean prior to the use. The fees must include overhead costs and be comparable to what the private sector in other cities charges, or to what other universities charge. The fee schedule must be filed with the Vice President for Business affairs, and the faculty member authorized to use the facilities or equipment is responsible to the University for payment of the fees.

 

7. Responsibility. The University assumes no responsibility for the competence or performance of a faculty member who engages in outside work for compensation. No such responsibility may be implied in any advertising or contractual documents. University stationery may not be used for correspondence related to outside work.

   See Section 104 of ~SB 6111--Chapter 154.

   See Section 115 (4) of ~SB 6111--Chapter 154.

   See Section 112 (2) of ~SB 6111--Chapter 154.

 

 

XIII.      Leaves of Absence

 

         A.    Professional Leaves (June 2004)

 

                1.    Purpose

 

                       The University views professional leave opportunities as a primary faculty development that enhances scholarship, teaching, and creativity.  Professional leave is considered to be primarily for the purpose of affording faculty members an opportunity to carry forward research, to improve teaching techniques or methods, or to participate in other creative endeavors which by their nature and scope will enable individuals to enhance their contributions to the programs of the University.  Professional leave is also appropriate for the purpose of such study programs designed to provide the faculty member with knowledge of an area of specialization vital to a program of the University.

 

2.    Eligibility

 

a.    Faculty members may be granted professional leave for a maximum of one academic year for each leave.  Only tenured faculty are eligible to apply for professional leave.  A professional leave may be granted to a faculty member on fractional appointment up to the fraction of an FTEF that the faculty member held in the year prior to award of the leave.  For library faculty with twelve-month obligations, leaves may be scheduled at any time during the calendar year.

 

b.    Faculty members granted professional leave are required to return to the institution for a period of time equal in length to the length of the professional leave. If the person does not return to the institution after a professional leave, the person will reimburse the university for the cost of the leave in terms of salary and fringe benefits.

 

c.      Ordinarily, professional leaves are awarded in February for the following academic year.  However, in exceptional circumstances, the professional leave committee may recommend requests for leaves for the second academic year following application.

 

d.          (i)  A person must serve a minimum of six years (or eighteen regular term quarters) at Western Washington University before the first professional leave is taken.  Faculty members on fractional appointment, who have received tenure, must serve a minimum of six years (or eighteen regular term quarters) at Western Washington University before the first professional leave is taken.

            (ii)  Eligibility for professional leave accumulates at the rate of one quarter of leave per six quarters of full-time service. Leaves of less than one academic year may be awarded.  Leaves may not be divided into segments of less than one quarter.  A faculty member may not accumulate more than one academic year of eligibility for professional leave.

            (iii)  Should a person apply for less than the accumulated quarters of eligibility, she/he shall be eligible to apply for the remaining quarters of eligibility in succeeding years.  Should a faculty member be awarded fewer quarters of leave than requested, she/he shall be eligible to apply for the remaining quarters of eligibility in succeeding years.

 

e.      Certain periods of other types of leave may count as service to the institution for accumulation of professional leave benefits. In general, leaves of a compassionate nature and leaves that serve the academic missions of the institution may count. See specific provisions in the remainder of item XIII. No more than three quarters of leave (of any type) may be counted, at the rate of one quarter as part of two years’ service, toward eligibility for professional leave. For example, a person with five years of full-time teaching duties and one year of “leave without pay – military”  would be eligible for a three-quarter duration professional leave. In a subsequent period, that person might combine five quarters of full-time teaching with one quarter of “Disability Leave/Pregnancy” to be eligible for a one-quarter duration professional leave.

 

f.   Total professional leaves at any one time are limited by statute to four percent of the faculty engaged in instruction and exempt staff.

               

                3.    Application Procedure

 

                       a.    The Provost will issue a call for applications for professional leave by mid-September.

 

                       b.    The following information is to be supplied in an application form, which is obtained from the appropriate dean:

 

                              (1)   The number of quarters and dates of leave desired.

 

                              (2)   A detailed statement of the applicant's plans for utilizing the time requested and how this would be of value to the University.

 

                              (3)   Names of institutions and individuals with which the applicant will be associated, together with pertinent itineraries and specific dates.

 

                              (4)   A statement of any time to be spent on other duties and any compensation to be received.

 

                              (5)   A current vita.

 

                              (6)   In cases where technical support is required for the project, a statement of support costs and how these will be met.

 

                              (7)   Additional material in support of the proposed program such as examples of the applicant's work.

 

                              (8)   Copies of reports of any previous professional leaves and reports of the results of any summer research or teaching grants or faculty development grants the faculty member may have received over the previous three years.  The application should also include descriptions of any applications for summer research or teaching grants or faculty development grants that are still pending decision.

 

                              (9)   Upon receipt of materials from the applicant, the chairperson's recommendation to the dean will include an evaluation of the merits of the proposal and the benefits the activity described in the proposal could provide the faculty member and the programs offered in the Department.

 

                       c.    The completed application will be submitted by the chairperson to the dean of the applicant's college by October 15.

 

                4.    Review Procedure

 

                       a.    The dean of each college, in cooperation with the appropriate chairperson, shall evaluate all applications from that college.  The deans of the colleges may implement additional review procedures at the college level consistent with the policies of the respective colleges.  The merits of the application and the expected benefits to the individual, the department, and the University shall be assessed.  The application will be judged on the basis of merit alone.

 

                       b.    The deans will forward all applications to the Provost by November 15.  The Provost, advised by a faculty committee composed of six members, will submit the final recommendations to the President regarding the professional leave awards.  The faculty committee will be selected by the Provost from among those faculty who have returned from professional leave within the previous three years.  As far as possible, committee membership will include faculty representing all the disciplines.  It is not the intent that each college shall have a representative on the committee.  The committee members serve three-year terms, one third of the committee being replaced each year. The Provost shall notify the applicants and their chairpersons and deans of the decision and the basis for it by January 15th.  The President will report the decisions to the Board of Trustees at the February meeting.

 

                5.    Compensation

 

                       An individual awarded professional leave shall be compensated by the University as follows:

 

                            a.    If no other form of compensation is involved, such as grant funds, stipends, or fellowships, compensation by the University shall be an amount equal to the normally contracted salary for the period of the leave, provided that such compensation does not exceed the limits set by the law. (Note that current law limits the amount that can be paid faculty.  RCW28B.10.650 states that remuneration from state general funds and general local funds for any such leave granted for any academic year shall not exceed the average of the highest quartile of a rank order of salaries of all full-time teaching faculty holding academic year contracts or appointments at the institution or in the district.)

 

                            b.    Faculty members are encouraged to seek external grants, fellowships or other sources of support to supplement the University leave salary.  Faculty members may supplement the University salary from outside sources to defray additional costs of travel, relocation of the faculty member and dependents to the location of the sabbatical project, and project expenses, provided prior written approval from the President is obtained.  Supplementary income is also subject to the following conditions:

            i)            If earning outside support requires work unrelated to the purposes of the leave, approval will not be given. 

            ii)          If the source of the supplementary salary is a scholarship or fellowship, no approval is necessary. 

            iii)         If the supplementary salary is from a grant or a contract administered by the University, the total of the University salary and the supplementary salary may not exceed the contracted salary of the faculty member. 

 

                6.  Reports

 

              Within one quarter after the faculty member returns from professional leave, the faculty member will provide a written report to the chair, dean, and Provost, describing what was accomplished during the leave, including the benefits of the leave.  The faculty member may be requested to present or provide a public lecture or, in some other way, share the benefits of the leave with the rest of the university community.

 

         B.   Special Leaves

 

                Special leave of short duration may be granted at the discretion of the appropriate dean in consultation with the appropriate department chairperson.  A faculty member going on special leave must first make appropriate arrangements regarding classes with his/her department chairperson.

 

         C.  Illness or Accident Leaves

 

                1.    Short-term Illness or Accident

 

                       A short-term illness or accident is an illness or accident that prevents a faculty member from discharging his or her responsibilities for a period of less than ten working days.  Procedures for covering a faculty member's responsibilities during a period of short-term illness are developed by each department or college to cover the unique conditions of that unit.  A short-term illness or accident leave may also be used by faculty who must care for another who is injured or ill.

 

                2.    Recurrent Short-term Illness  

 

                       A faculty member is deemed to have a recurrent short-term illness when the total number of days of service missed exceeds ten but a disabling condition is not claimed to exist.  When a faculty member has a recurrent short-term illness, the Vice President for Academic Affairs may require verification of the illness by a physician acceptable to the university.  The Vice President of Academic Affairs may also require that the faculty member present evidence that he or she is receiving treatment to remedy the condition.

 

         D.   Disability Leaves, including Pregnancy

 

                It is the policy of the University to aid faculty through periods of disability to encourage full and speedy recovery.

 

                1.    Definition

 

                       Disability means the incapacity to perform regular duties for a period of ten or more consecutive days, resulting from accident, illness, or pregnancy.  The determination of disability or the ability to resume normal duties may be made by a physician of the University's choice.

 

                2.    Eligibility for Benefits

a.    A faculty member becomes eligible for disability benefits on assuming a full-time (1.0 FTE) appointment with the University.  No faculty member may receive benefits before a service has been performed.  Tenured and probationary faculty on reduced appointments are also eligible for benefits based on the percentage of FTE assigned at the time of disability.

b.     Faculty who have resigned or are terminated or not reappointed are not eligible for benefits beyond the end of their contract period.

c.    At the discretion of the President or the President's designee, any newly appointed faculty member may be required to undergo a medical examination in order to become eligible for disability benefits.  The President or President's designee will select the physician, and the University will assume the cost of the medical examination.

d.    Any faculty member on disability leave must submit to the office of the President or President's designee a verification of disability.

e.    Disability benefits begin for eligible faculty members with the first day of such disability, provided that the disability begins between September 15 and June 14 of that academic year.

f.     Faculty employed for the summer session are eligible for benefits such that the total of salary and benefits does not exceed their summer contract.

i)                        Faculty who are disabled between June 15 and September 14 and who are not teaching in the summer quarter are eligible for disability benefits beginning September 15, or earlier, at the discretion of the President or President's designee, provided that the disability is for a period of more than 30 calendar days within the period June 15 and September 14.  Benefits received in the period June 15 to September 14 shall not exceed the full-time summer contract salary.

ii)                      Basic disability leave shall be given for each separate case of disability as required for recovery to resume normal duties up to the maximum time specified.  Before assuming normal duties, the University may require a certificate of ability to return to normal duties.

iii)                    Disability benefits are awarded only for the period of time the individual is unable to perform assigned duties.

iv)                    Extended leave without pay beyond the basic disability leave may be granted at the discretion of the President and the Board of Trustees.

v)                      At the discretion of President or President's designee limited-term faculty may receive disability benefits to the end of their appointment period.

 

                3.    Benefits 

   a.    Full-time faculty members will receive benefits as follows:  Full pay and full status for the first 180 calendar days during which they are eligible to receive disability benefits.  At the discretion of the President or President's designee disability leave of up to thirty working days may be granted for the care of another who is injured or ill, in which case the University's policy for paid substitutes will take effect.

   b.    The faculty member's standard contribution to TIAA/CREF retirement plans will be matched by the University during the first 180 calendar days of disability.

   c.    If eligibility for disability leave continues after 180 calendar days, the faculty member may go on long-term disability insurance benefits, provided that the faculty member has elected to carry such long-term disability coverage as part of his/her insurance package and qualifies under the rules of that plan.

   d.    The disability benefits for limited-term faculty members are limited to those specified or to the end of their appointment period, whichever is the earlier.

 

                4.    Administration of Disability Leaves

  a.    Details of providing for a substitute and for pay shall be handled by the appropriate administrators.

  b.    To ensure than an individual on leave will take the full time needed for recovery and be free of worry, the University policy is to provide for paid substitutes.

  c.     In emergencies, colleagues of the disabled individual should be ready to absorb from non-teaching responsibilities the workload of the individual.

  e.     Disability leave shall be granted beginning with the date on which the individual is disabled.

  f.     Termination of disability leave benefits shall be preceded by advance written notice to the individual concerned and such termination is made through an official Personnel Action form.

  g.     Up to three quarters of disability leave will be counted in determining eligibility for professional leave, subject to limitations in section A.2.e. above.

 

                5.    Pregnancy Leave

 

                Leave for pregnancy will cover the period of disability prior to, during, and after childbirth as determined by the faculty member's attending health professional and will be for approximately ten weeks, or more if needed for medical reasons.

 

Faculty returning from a pregnancy leave may be granted modified duties with reduced compensation along with continued partial disability benefits for periods of partial disability during the recovery period, the length of which shall be determined by the attending health professional.

 

E.    Modified Duties

 

Periods of modified duties, with reduction in pay, shall be granted on request to any faculty member who must care for a child or an injured or ill person.  During this period, a reduction of normal duties will be negotiated with the department and is subject to approval by the President or President's designee.  The period of modified duties normally shall not exceed one quarter (10 weeks) for each circumstance, although the President or President's designee may approve an extension in exceptional cases. One quarter of modified duties status will be counted as full-time service in determining eligibility for professional leave, subject to limitations in section A.2.e. above.

 

F.    Leaves for Jury or Court Duty

 

Faculty members serving on juries or as witnesses in legal actions shall attempt to arrange their court obligations to minimize interference with their classes and other University responsibilities.  When it is not possible for a faculty member to meet some or all of his/her university duties because of required service as a juror or witness (excluding compensated service as an expert witness), the University shall assume the responsibility for substitutes.  Faculty shall retain full pay and status during such periods, less that amount received as remuneration for service on the jury. The period of leave for jury or court duty (excluding compensated service as an expert witness) will be counted as full-time service in determining eligibility for professional leave, subject to limitations in section A.2.e. above.

 

G.   Leaves without Pay - General Statement

 

1.    Leaves without pay may be granted to faculty members with one or more years of service.  Requests for such leaves shall contain a statement of the applicant's purpose and plan.  Leave is granted for a period of time up to one year, but may be extended to two years upon the recommendation of the chairperson and/or dean and the President or President's designee.  In case a faculty member is elected to public office, the leave will be for the term of that public office.  Whether the faculty member returning from leave shall be entitled to pay at the rate the individual would be receiving if in continuous service to the University shall be determined by the President or President's designee at the time the leave is granted.

 

2.    Upon returning, the faculty member shall resume the same position or its equivalent, unless the individual was promoted while on leave.

 

3.    Normally, requests for leave shall be made at least two quarters in advance of the beginning of the leave.  Requests for extension of leave shall follow the same rule.

 

4.    A faculty member securing a leave shall have a written statement from the President or President's designee indicating the times when the leave is to begin and end, and for probationary faculty, whether or not the leave period counts toward the period of service for tenure. Whether the period of leave without pay will be counted as full-time service in determining eligibility for professional leave is based on the purpose of the leave, as specified in the following paragraphs.

 

5.    A  faculty member who has a work assignment at the university for at least one day a month during a leave without pay will be eligible for continued paid benefits.  If this condition is not met, faculty may elect to convert to a self-pay basis.

 

    H.    Leaves without Pay - Compassionate

               

Compassionate leave without pay may be granted by the President or President's designee for up to one year to any faculty member.  The purpose of compassionate leave shall be to allow the faculty member to care for a young child or an injured or ill person.  The need for compassionate leave probably will arrive suddenly, so notice in advance may not be possible.  The faculty member, the President or President's designee, and the chair and/or dean will work together to minimize any disruption to the department and to students that will be caused by the leave.  Up to three quarters of compassionate leave without pay will be counted in determining eligibility for professional leave, subject to limitations in section A.2.e. above.

 

    I.     Leaves without Pay - Military

 

1.  Military leaves shall be granted when a faculty member is drafted, recalled into service, or, in the time of war, voluntarily enters the service.  The privilege shall be extended to faculty members undertaking military or wartime assignments in a civilian capacity.  The faculty member returning from leave shall be entitled to pay at the rate the individual would be receiving if in continuous service to the University. Up to three quarters of military leave without pay will be counted in determining eligibility for professional leave, subject to limitations in section A.2.e. above.

 

2.  Upon returning, the faculty member shall resume the same position or its equivalent, unless the individual was promoted while on leave.

 

3.  A faculty member on military leave shall be entitled to a written statement from the administration indicating re-employability the first quarter following inactivation, provided no arrangement has been made with a substitute to fill the position.  If such an arrangement has been made, the returning member shall be reinstated the next quarter.

 

4.   The following legal provision applies to faculty and can be used when the faculty member cannot conveniently arrange to serve a period of active duty outside the academic year or summer session for which employed.  Every officer and employee of the state or of any county, city, or other political subdivision thereof who is a member of the Washington National Guard or of the Army, Navy, Air Force, Coast Guard, or Marine Corps Reserve of the United States, or of any organized Reserve Armed Forces of the United States shall be entitled to and shall be granted military leaves of absence from such employment for a period not exceeding 15 calendar days during each year.  Such leaves shall be granted in order that the person may participate in active training duty in such a manner and at such time as ordered into active training duty. Such military leaves of absence shall be in addition to any vacation or sick leave to which the individual might otherwise be entitled and shall not involve any loss of efficiency rating, privileges, or pay.  During the period of military leave, the faculty member shall receive from the state or the county, city, or other political subdivision, normal pay. Time spent in active training duty will be counted in determining eligibility for professional leave, subject to limitations in section A.2.e. above.

 

      J.    Leave without Pay - Elective Office

 

1.   Faculty members may file and campaign for any elective public office without any change in faculty status as long as such campaigning does not interfere with assigned responsibilities.

 

2.   In a case where there may be interference with assigned duties as determined by the dean, either while campaigning for elective office or after election to such office as state legislator, the faculty member must request a leave of absence without pay through the appropriate dean.

 

3.   Elective office leave without pay will not normally count in determining eligibility for professional leave. However, the faculty member may include in his or her request that up to three quarters of this leave count in determining eligibility for professional leave, subject to limitations in section A.2.e. above. The President or President’s designee will provide a written statement of decision to the faculty member at the time the leave is granted.

 

K.   Leave without Pay – Academic Pursuits

 

1.   A faculty member who takes a leave without pay for study, scholarly or creative activity, or professional development may receive certain insurance and retirement benefits while on leave, provided that, in the opinion of the dean and the President or President's designee the purposes of the leave directly benefit the institution, and provided that the compensation available to the faculty member on leave is less than the compensation (including benefits) the faculty member would have received had he/she remained in the University's employ.  With these provisions, the faculty member will be paid a reduced salary sufficient to continue insurance coverages paid directly by the state and to cover the costs of disability insurance.

 

2.   Leave without pay for academic pursuits may count in determining eligibility for professional leave. The faculty member may include in his or her request that up to three quarters of this leave count in determining eligibility for professional leave, subject to limitations in section A.2.e. above. The President or President’s designee will provide a written statement of decision to the faculty member at the time the leave is granted.

 

    L.     Leave without Pay – Other

 

A faculty member desiring leave without pay for reasons other than those noted elsewhere in this section would make application through his or her chair or dean, as appropriate.  Requests for such leaves shall contain a statement of the applicant's purpose and plan.  Leave is granted for a period of time up to one year, but may be extended to two years upon the recommendation of the chairperson and/or dean and the President or President's designee. This leave will not normally count in determining eligibility for professional leave. However, the faculty member may include in his or her request that up to three quarters of this leave count in determining eligibility for professional leave, subject to limitations in section A.2.e. above.  The President or President’s designee will provide a written statement of decision to the faculty member at the time the leave is granted.

 

 

XIV.   Retirement

(For information on cashability options, contact the Assistant Director of Human Resources/Benefits Office, X7314)

 

         A.    Faculty Retirement System at WWU is a combination of Teachers Insurances and Annuities Association and its companion organization College Retirement and Equities Fund (TIAA/CREF), and the University Supplemental Retirement Income Payment, in addition to Social Security (RSDHI).

 

         B.    As a condition of employment, eligible faculty members must begin contributory participation in the Retirement System at the beginning of the third year of eligible service.  They may, at their option, begin contributory participation earlier.  Eligible faculty members are those with a minimum of half-time appointment for more than two quarters of an academic year.  The rate of contribution is five percent of salary to age 35, and seven and one-half percent following the 35th birthday of the participant.  (After reaching age 50, and upon application, a faculty member may elect to raise his/her contribution rate from seven and one-half percent to ten percent of salary in order to obtain maximum University Supplemental Income Payment upon retirement.)  Participation in Social Security begins the first year of employment.  TIAA/CREF participants are eligible for tax deferment plans.  For details of such plans, inquire of the Faculty/Staff Benefits Office.

 

         C.   The University contributes an amount equal to the faculty member's contribution as described above.  The contributions, both the University's and faculty member's, are allocated 50 percent to TIAA and 50 percent to CREF unless the faculty member elects a different distribution, provided that the percentages are not fractional percentages.  The Faculty Senate has approved two CREF options:  "Social Choice" and "Bond Market Account."  Information on these options is available from the Faculty/Staff Benefits Office.

 

         D.   A faculty member may elect to retire at the earliest age specified for retirement by Federal Social Security Law.  Likewise, a faculty member may be retired for reasons of health and/or disability at an earlier age.  Before making a decision to retire or to retire early, a faculty member should check what benefits he/she will receive.  {revised 12/2005}

 

         E.    A faculty member making a request for retirement should specify the effective date and should make the request at least six months in advance of that effective date so that arrangements can be made.

 

         F.    Before retirement, a faculty member is permitted to arrange with his/her unit for a reduced load and salary, acceptable to both the faculty member and the unit, without loss of tenure or rank until retirement.  After retirement, the faculty member may be re-employed annually on a part-time basis consistent with program needs and with departmental agreement without loss of rank. Individuals who take this option may jeopardize the supplemental TIAA/CREF income normally made by the State of Washington Retirement System.

 

         G.   Retirement benefits at age 65 and after 25 years of full-time employment in Washington State institutions of higher education shall be not less than 50 percent of the average of the highest two years (24 consecutive months) salary from such Washington State institutions, assuming 10 percent contribution to TIAA/CREF after age 50 as per above, this in addition to Social Security benefits.

 

         H.    In case the TIAA/CREF benefits (combined with Washington State teachers retirement benefits earned in Washington State institutions of higher learning, if any) on retirement after the age of 65 and after 25 years of full-time employment in Washington State institutions of higher education are less than 50 percent of the average highest two years salary, all as described above, then the University shall provide a Supplemental Retirement Income Payment equal to that difference.  A faculty member must be employed in a position requiring more than 70 hours per month in at least five months of the year for the year to count as full-time employment.

 

         I.     Details of the faculty retirement plan are found in Retirement Rules and Regulation as approved by the Board of Trustees June 3, 1982, (amended on February 3, 1994, to allow up to 100% cashability withdrawal of CFEF accumulations) and available in the Faculty/Staff Benefits Office.

 

XV.  Termination and Non-Reappointment

 

A.       Resignation

 

A faculty member may terminate his/her appointment effective at the end of an academic year, provided that notice is given in writing at the earliest possible opportunity, but not later than May 15, or 30 days after receiving notification of the terms of appointment for the coming year, whichever is later.  The faculty member may properly request a waiver of this requirement of notice in case of hardship or in a situation where substantial professional advancement or other opportunity would otherwise be denied.

 

B.        Non-Reappointment

 

1.    Written notice that a probationary appointment is not to be renewed will be given to the faculty member by the dean or Provost/Vice President for Academic Affairs in advance of the expiration of the appointment.  The faculty member shall receive this written notice:

 

a.   Not later than March 1 of the first academic year of service if the appointment expires at the end of that year; or, if a one-year appointment terminates during an academic year, at least three months in advance of its termination;

 

b.  Not later than December 15 of the second academic year of service if the appointment expires at the end of that year; or, if an initial two-year appointment terminates during an academic year, at least six months in advance of its termination;

 

c.   At least 12 months before the expiration of an appointment after two or more years of service at the institution.

 

2.    The institution will notify faculty members of their renewals by March 15.

 

3.    When any recommendation not to renew an appointment has been made or a decision not to renew an appointment has first been reached, the faculty member involved will be informed of that recommendation or decision in writing by the body or individual making the recommendation or decision.  If the faculty member so requests, he/she will be advised orally of the reasons which contributed to that decision.  The faculty member may request a reconsideration by the recommending or deciding body or individual within ten working days of the date on which the written notice was received.  For the purpose of this section, a faculty member will be deemed to have received notice after five working days of the date on which the notice was mailed by registered mail.

 

4.    If the faculty member so requests, the reasons given in explanation of the nonrenewal will be confirmed in writing.

 

         C.   Reduction in Force (RIF)

 

     Termination of an appointment with continuous tenure, or of a probationary or limited-term appointment before the end of the specified term, may occur under extraordinary circumstances because of a demonstrably bona fide financial exigency or reduction/reallocation in force owing to legislative mandate.  In such a case, the procedures set forth in Appendix I shall apply.

 

         D.   Elimination or Merger of a Degree Program, College or Department of Instruction

 

Termination of an appointment with continuous tenure, or of a probationary or limited-term appointment before the end of the specified term, may occur as a result of bona fide formal discontinuance of an interdepartmental degree program, college or department of instruction.  These procedures are intended to apply to the proposed elimination or merger of degree programs, departments of instruction, or colleges.  They are not intended to apply to programs, other than degree programs, housed exclusively within a single department nor to settle questions within a department regarding the internal allocation of that department's resources.  The following standards and procedures will apply:

 

1.    The decision to discontinue formally a program, department of instruction, or college will be based essentially upon educational consideration as recommended to the President by the Provost with input from the appropriate Dean(s), the faculty, the Academic Coordinating Commission and University Planning Council.  The recommendation of the Provost and President shall be based primarily on the input received through the processes of faculty governance as provided for below.  The final decision will be made by the Board of Trustees.

        

2.    Each college will develop a policy for elimination or merger of a degree program or department.  Each college policy will be published in the college section of the Faculty Handbook.  The policies shall address procedures and criteria for elimination or merger and shall identify how faculty input concerning the proposed elimination and merger will be obtained.

 

   The Provost will develop a policy for merger and elimination of a college.  The policy will address the procedures and criteria for elimination or merger and will identify how faculty input concerning the proposed elimination or merger will be obtained.  The policy will be submitted to the Dean(s), the Academic Coordinating Commission and the University Planning Council for input.  The final policy will be posted on the Faculty Senate website and delivered to the faculty through an e-mail, flyer, or by publication in FAST.

 

  3.   Degree programs, departments or colleges may be identified as candidates for elimination or merger by the appropriate Dean(s) or the Provost.  A program, department or college may be identified for possible closure or merger if educational policy dictates a change in the priorities of the University or if it no longer contributes to the educational mission of the University.  The criteria for eliminating or merging programs, or departments departments or colleges will be consistent with the Higher Education Coordinating Board's "Policy and Procedures for the Review of Existing Academic Programs" as well as with the Strategic Plan of the University and its colleges.

 

  4.   Provost will initiate a review of a degree program, department or college for possible closure or merger.

 

                    a)     In the case of merger or elimination of a degree program or department, the college will undertake the review following procedures developed within the college.  After review within the college, the faculty recommendation and report, together with the criteria and rationale for the proposed elimination or merger, will be forwarded to the Academic Coordinating Commission and the University Planning Council.  The ACC and UPC will review the proposal and may provide justified recommendations to the Dean(s).  The Dean(s) will forward to the Provost a recommendation that will include the recommendations of the college review process.  The Dean(s) will also forward to the Provost the reports and recommendations of the ACC & UPC.  The final recommendation of the Provost will be submitted to the President and will include the recommendations and reports of the ACC and UPC.

 

                    b)     In the case of college elimination or merger, the Provost will undertake the review following the publication of procedures as per Section XV.D.2.  The recommendation of the Provost will be submitted to the ACC and UPC.  The criteria and rationale for the elimination or merger will be included with the recommendation.  The ACC and UPC may submit justified recommendations and reports to the Provost.  The final recommendation of the Provost will be submitted to the President and will include the recommendations and reports of the ACC and UPC.

  

 5.   Before the administration issues notice to a faculty member of its intention to terminate an appointment because of formal discontinuance of an degree program, department or college the institution will make every effort to place the faculty member concerned in another suitable position.  If placement in another position would be facilitated by a reasonable period of training, financial and other support for such training will be proffered.  If no position is available within the institution, with or without retraining, the faculty member's appointment may then be terminated with severance salary of two quarters for non-tenured faculty, three quarters for tenured faculty.  Tenured faculty may elect to receive three years notice of termination as an alternative to three quarters severance salary, provided that the termination of the program is not part of a Reduction in Force.

 

 6.   A faculty member may appeal a proposed relocation or termination resulting from a discontinuance, as mentioned above, and has a right to a full hearing before the Faculty Senate or an appropriate subcommittee thereof.  The hearing need not conform in all respects with the proceeding conducted pursuant to termination for cause, but the essentials of an on-the-record adjudicative hearing will be observed.  The issues in such a hearing may include the institution's failure to satisfy any of the conditions specified in this section.  In such a hearing a faculty determination that a program or department is to be discontinued will be considered presumptively valid, but the burden of proof on other issues will rest on the administration.

 

       E.    Termination for Medical Reasons

 

          Termination of an appointment with continuous tenure, or of a probationary or limited-term appointment before the end of the period of appointment, for medical reasons, will be based upon clear and convincing medical evidence that the faculty member cannot continue to fulfill the terms and conditions of the appointment.  The decision to terminate will be reached only after there has been appropriate consultation and after the faculty member concerned, or someone representing the faculty member, has been informed of the basis of the proposed action and has been afforded an opportunity to respond to the evidence.  If the faculty member so requests, the evidence will be reviewed by the Faculty Senate before a final decision is made by the Board of Trustees on the recommendation of the President.  The faculty member will be given severance salary not less than two quarters for a non-tenured or three quarters for a tenured faculty member.

 

TERMINATION FOR CAUSE

 

       F.    Termination for Cause

 

Termination of an appointment with continuous tenure, or of a probationary or limited-term appointment before the end of the specified term, may be effected by the institution only for adequate cause. Hereafter, "faculty member" refers to the person against whom a charge of misconduct has been made.

A.   Adequate cause for a dismissal will be related, directly and [materially], to the fitness of faculty members in their professional capacities as teachers or researchers. Dismissal will not be used to restrain faculty members in their exercise of academic freedom or other rights [guaranteed by the United States Constitution and the Constitution of the State of Washington] (adapted from American Association of University Professors Policy Documents and Reports, Recommended Institutional Regulations on Academic Freedom and Tenure, Section 5, paragraph (a), 1995 Edition).  To warrant a removal for cause, conduct falling within the five categories in 1.b. below must in a substantial way adversely affect the faculty member's academic, scholarly, or professional ability to carry out his or her University responsibilities.  In cases in which the faculty member's behavior is alleged to have adversely affected another person, the impact of the faculty member's behavior must have affected the other person's ability to carry out his or her academic, scholarly, or professional University responsibilities in an intentional and malicious way.  Faculty responsibilities are listed in the FH Section I, Part III, paragraphs C and D (page 3 of the 1999 edition).

 

B.   A faculty member covered under the Faculty Handbook may be dismissed for cause from his or her position only for one or more of the following reasons:

1)     A serious and persistent neglect of faculty duties.

2)     Unlawful discrimination or sexual harassment. (See Appendix C of WWU FH.)

3)     Serious scientific or scholarly misconduct, consisting of, but not limited to, significant misrepresentation of credentials, falsification of data, plagiarism, abuse of confidentiality, violation of regulations applicable to research, or failure to meet minimum standards of professional competence.

4)    Conviction of a felony.

5)    Intentional and malicious interference with the scientific, scholarly, and academic activities of others.

 

C.   Termination will follow the procedures in the section of the Faculty Handbook on Imposition of Severe Sanctions and Dismissal.

  

SEVERE SANCTIONS OTHER THAN DISMISSAL

 

XVI.   Severe Sanctions Other Than Dismissal

 

To warrant a severe sanction other than dismissal, conduct falling within the five categories listed under Termination for Cause, section 1, must affect the faculty member’s academic, scholarly, or professional ability to carry out his or her University responsibilities. In cases where the faculty member's behavior is alleged to have adversely affected another person, the impact of the faculty member's behavior must have affected the other person's ability to carry out his or her academic, scholarly, or professional university rights or responsibilities in a substantial way.

 

Sanctions will not be used to restrain faculty members in their exercise of academic freedom or other rights guaranteed by the United States Constitution and the Constitution of the State of Washington.

 

Appropriate sanctions will be recommended by a committee of faculty peers. See section, Imposition of Severe Sanctions and Dismissal for the procedures. Severe sanctions are those that involve reduction in salary or temporary suspension with or without pay. Such sanctions in no way abrogate tenure.

  

PROCEDURES FOR IMPOSITION OF SEVERE SANCTIONS OR DISMISSAL FOR CAUSE

 

XVII.      Procedures for the Imposition of Severe Sanctions or Dismissal for Cause

 

Adequate cause for the imposition of a severe sanction, including dismissal for cause, is defined in XV.F

 

If the Dean or Provost believes that the conduct of a faculty member constitutes adequate cause for dismissal or is sufficiently grave to justify imposition of a severe sanction, such as suspension from service for a stated period, the Provost may institute a proceeding according to the procedures outlined in C. below.

 

Procedures for Imposition of Severe Sanctions Including Dismissal for Cause

1.     A formal hearing on charges relating to severe sanction or dismissal will be preceded by: (1) discussions between the faculty member and appropriate administrative officers looking toward a mutually acceptable settlement which, if agreed to, terminates the proceeding; (2) informal inquiry by a three-person panel chosen by the Executive Council of the Faculty Senate in consultation with the Chair of the Standing Committee on Grievance and Sanctions from among the members of the latter committee, which may effect an adjustment with the agreement of all parties.  The three-person panel’s inquiry is to be limited to discussions with the faculty member, Department Chair, Dean and Provost and is to be completed within 15 working days of formation of the Panel; (3) Failing such an agreement, within ten days a written statement of charges will be framed with reasonable particularity by the Provost and given to the faculty member and the President of the Faculty Senate. (Here and hereafter, faculty member refers to the person against whom the charges of misconduct have been made).

 

2.  The charges having been stated, the individual concerned will have the right to be heard initially by a Hearing Panel. The Hearing Panel, appointed within 10 working days of the filing of the statement of charges, will consist of five or more members selected by the Executive Council of the Faculty Senate in consultation with the chair of the Standing Committee on Grievance and Sanctions from among the membership of the latter committee who did not serve on the three-member panel of informal inquiry in C.1.(2) above. Members deemed disqualified for bias or interest will remove themselves from the case, either at the request of a party or on their own initiative. Each party will have a maximum of two challenges without stated cause.  Vacancies will be filled by additional members of the Standing Committee on Grievance and Sanctions. If there are insufficient members of that committee, then temporary additional members will be appointed by the Executive Council of the Faculty Senate. The temporary members may also be challenged for prejudice.  The hearings are coordinated by a Hearing Officer, appointed within 10 working days of the filing of the statement of charges and selected by the President of the University and the President of the Faculty Senate, and serving as a non-voting presiding officer of the panel. In cases in which the sanction may be dismissal for cause, the Hearing Officer shall be an administrative law judge or other attorney in good standing with the Washington State Bar Association.

 

a.   From the time at which charges are specified, the faculty member may be suspended, or assigned to other duties in lieu of suspension, only if immediate harm to the faculty member or others is threatened by continuance. Before suspending a faculty member, pending an ultimate determination of the faculty member’s status through the institution’s hearing procedures, the Provost will consult with the Executive Council of the Faculty Senate concerning the propriety, the length, and the other conditions of any suspension.  This consultation will occur within 10 working days of the filing of the statement of charges.  No suspension or assignment to other duties in lieu of suspension will be final, for that would constitute dismissal. Salary will continue during the period of the suspension.

 

b.   The Hearing Panel may, with the consent of the parties concerned, hold joint prehearing meetings with the parties in order to (i) simplify the issues, (ii) effect stipulations of facts, (iii) provide for the exchange of documentary or other information, and (iv) achieve such other appropriate prehearing objectives as will make the hearing fair, effective, and expeditious.

 

c.   Within ten days of his or her appointment, the Hearing Officer shall schedule a hearing. Service of notice of hearing on the specific charges filed by the Provost will be made at least 15 working days prior to the hearing. Working days are defined for these procedures as days in which the university is in regular academic year session (not summer quarter) and engaged in instructional activities.  Proceedings may continue out of the regular academic year session with the agreement of the parties and all members of the Hearing Panel, and with appropriate compensation to those whose involvement is required.  The faculty member may waive a hearing or may respond to the charges in writing at any time before the hearing. If the faculty member waives a hearing, but denies the charges or asserts that the charges do not support a finding of adequate cause, the Hearing Panel will evaluate all available evidence and rest its judgment upon the evidence in the record.

d.   The hearing will be private, unless the Hearing Panel, in consultation with the Provost and only with the agreement of the faculty member, decides that the hearing should be public.

e.    During the proceedings the faculty member will be permitted to have an academic advisor, a representative of a responsible educational association, and/or counsel of the faculty member’s choice.

f.    A verbatim record of the full hearing, consisting of a court-quality audio-tape and its transcript, will be taken by a court reporter or other qualified individual acceptable to the Attorney General’s office at the University’s expense. At the faculty member’s request, a copy of the transcript will be made available to the faculty member without cost as soon as possible. The records generated during these proceedings, including the tape, will be kept in the Faculty Senate office.

g  The Hearing Panel will grant adjournments to enable either party to investigate evidence as to which a valid claim of surprise is made.

h.   The faculty member will be afforded an opportunity to obtain necessary witnesses and documentary or other evidence. Both parties will cooperate with the Hearing Panel in securing witnesses and making available documentary and other evidence.

i.    Both parties will have the right to confront and cross-examine all witnesses.  Where the witnesses cannot or will not appear, but the Hearing Panel determines that the interests of justice require admission of their statements, the panel will identify the witnesses, disclose their statements, and, if possible, provide for interrogatories.

j.    In the hearing of charges of neglect of duties, misconduct, failure to meet minimum standards of professional competence, or interference, the testimony may include that of qualified faculty members from this or other institutions of higher education.

k   The Hearing Panel will not be bound by strict rules of legal evidence, and may admit any evidence that is of probative value in determining the issues involved.  Every possible effort will be made to obtain the most reliable evidence available.

l.    The findings of fact and the judgment of the Hearing Panel will be based solely on the hearing record. The burden of proof that adequate cause exists rests with the institution and will be satisfied only by the preponderance of the evidence in the record considered as a whole.

m.  The judgment of the Hearing Panel shall be by majority vote. The number of ayes and nays will be part of the record. The judgment shall be rendered within fifteen days of the conclusion of the hearing.

n.   Except for such simple announcements as may be required, covering the time of the hearing and similar matters, public statements and publicity about the case by any person involved in the case will be avoided so far as possible until the proceedings have been completed, including consideration by the Board of Trustees of the institution. The University President, the Provost and the faculty member will be notified of the judgment of the Hearing Panel in writing and will be given a copy of any part of the record of the hearing that they have not already received.

o.   (1)   If the Hearing Panel concludes that adequate cause for dismissal or other severe sanctions has not been established by the evidence in the record, it will so report to the President within 10 days. o. (2) If the Hearing Panel concludes that adequate cause for dismissal or other severe sanctions has been established, it will recommend to the President dismissal or the sanction it considers appropriate, with supporting reasons.

 

3.   Action by the President

 

a.  The decision of the Hearing Panel shall become a final decision of the University unless either party files an appeal to the President within 10 days of the date of mailing by registered mail of the decision to the parties, or unless the President elects to review the decision by giving written notice of intent to review to the parties within 15 days of the date of delivery of the decision to the President. The presidential review shall include consideration of the written record. No new evidence shall be considered by the President.

 

b.  Within 30 days of commencement of the review, the President shall make one of the following determinations:(1) affirm the Panel's decision; or (2) remand for further proceedings. Any decision of the President to remand must be based on findings of the President that the decision of the Panel was arbitrary or capricious; the procedures followed by the Panel in reaching its decision were materially and prejudicially unfair or not in accordance with the law or University rules or regulations; and\or the review in which he or she has engaged has revealed the importance of evidence in the record which the Panel did not adequately consider.

 

c.  In the event that the President remands the decision to the Panel, the Panel then has 20 days to reconsider its decision and the reasons given by the President for remand, and to report back to the President its decision on remand. If the President rejects the report in whole or in part, the President will state the reasons for doing so, in writing, to the Hearing Panel and to the faculty member. The responses of the Hearing Panel and the faculty member will be transmitted to the Board, along with the recommendation of the President for a determination under the provisions in item # 4. below.

 

 4.  Action by the Board of Trustees

        

a.  Within ten days of a recommendation for dismissal or other severe sanction, the University President will, on request of the faculty member, transmit to the Board of Trustees the record of the case. The Board of Trustees’ review, to be conducted in Executive Session and scheduled within seventy-five days after the receipt of the request, will be primarily based on the record of the panel hearing, and it will provide opportunity for argument, oral or written or both, by the parties or by their representatives. The Board may request the parties to submit additional written arguments on particular issues and may request oral argument from the parties.  No new evidence shall be considered by the Board of Trustees.

 

b.  Within ten days following the review, the Board shall make one of the following determinations: (1) affirm the Panel's decision; (2) reverse or amend the Panel's decision; or (3) remand for further proceedings. Any decision of the Board of Trustees to reverse, amend, or remand must be based on findings of the Board that the decision of the Panel was arbitrary or capricious; the procedures followed by the Panel in reaching its decision were materially and prejudicially unfair or not in accordance with the law or University rules or regulations; or the review has revealed the importance of evidence which the Panel did not adequately consider. Any decision to reverse or amend without remand for further proceedings must include a finding that, and explanation as to why, further proceedings are not advisable. In the event the Board's decision is to affirm, reverse or amend the decision of the Panel, the adjudication will be deemed closed.

 

c.  If the decision is remanded to the Hearing Panel, the panel will then reconsider, taking into account the stated objections and receiving new evidence if necessary. The panel will respond to the Board's finding within 15 days. The Board shall make the final decision only after study of the panel's reconsideration. In the event that the Board decides to reverse or amend the reconsidered decision of the Panel, the final decision shall state the basis of such decision, including specific findings as to why the decision of the Panel was arbitrary or capricious, or why the procedures followed by the Panel in reaching its decision were materially and prejudicially unfair or not in accordance with the law or University rules or regulations.

 

(END Section I)

 

back

(links on Handbook main site to remaining SECTIONS and APPENDICES)